From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/10436
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Soup packet generation problems...
Date: 31 Mar 1997 12:33:50 +0200
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2ragwcpv5.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <2x67y9cclz.fsf@plexus.inesc.pt>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035150307 24425 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:45:07 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:45:07 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id DAA25622
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 03:21:50 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp19.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.119]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <NAA06100@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 13:10:19 +0200
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id MAA03063; Mon, 31 Mar 1997 12:34:00 +0200
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Nelson Jose dos Santos Ferreira's message of 30 Mar 1997 22:07:49 +0100
Original-Lines: 23
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.37/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10436
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:10436

Nelson Jose dos Santos Ferreira <Nelson.Ferreira@inesc.pt> writes:

> Well, to the point. When packing the Soup packet, it says it was
> unsuccesfull. I went and peeked at gnus-soup.el and saw that message
> appeared when the result of the call-process with invokes the packing
> comand does not validates under zerop... I tested that on the command
> line and the return code is really 0... I don't know how to solve
> this... Any ideas ??

Perhaps `call-process' is misbehaving.  What is your `shell-file-name'
set to, for instance?

> PS: Lars, since I'm a XEmacs user I noticed some of the icons on the
> etc packages have some "spots"probably due to some conversion
> process. I corrected them... Do you want me to send them to you ?

:-)  No, the dots are supposed to be there.  The metaphor employed is
a noteboard, and they have those holes in them, for some reason or
other. 

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  lmi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen