From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9369 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: nnfolder comments (may apply to other backends too) Date: 10 Jan 1997 15:58:42 +0100 Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149408 18094 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:30:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:30:08 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP id IAA09853 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 08:15:59 -0800 Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp13.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.113]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 16:47:05 +0100 Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id PAA09928; Fri, 10 Jan 1997 15:58:50 +0100 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no In-Reply-To: Jan Vroonhof's message of 10 Jan 1997 14:20:05 +0100 Original-Lines: 22 X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.81/Emacs 19.34 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > > > 1. Shouldn't nnfolder-generate-active-file ignore files with extention > > > nnmail-procmail-suffix ? > > > > I don't think so... > > Then what's use of having a suffix? To let nnmail know which files to suck in. `nnmail-procmail-suffix' isn't used by nnfolder for anything, and I don't see any reason why it should. > (n-g-a-f is way too aggressive for me anyway but I think it should > at least be possible to have all mail groups related stuff in one > directory) Probably not. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen