Re: adaptive word scoring

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>]

Robert Bihlmeyer <e9426626@student.tuwien.ac.at> writes:

> (I think I've already suggested this once:) IMHO word-scoring should
> derive it's scores from the normal adaptive (line-)scores (by deviding
> the line-score by the number of words in the subject). So if killed
> articles would get -50 for their subject, words from the subject
> should be scored with -50/(number of words) each (ignored words are
> not include in this count). In this way, word-scoring mimics the
> effects for line-scoring for single subjects, but has the intended
> side-effects on others. Furthermore, the scores would by a magnitude
> smaller than the line-scores, giving the latter priority.

I think that sounds reasonable...  Anybody have any thoughts on this?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen