From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6707
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Steven L Baur <steve@miranova.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: smiley.el (was Re: gnus-smiley.el -- new version)
Date: 14 Jun 1996 16:14:59 -0700
Sender: steve@miranova.com
Message-ID: <m2rarix9jg.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
References: <199606141723.AA017493012@teal.ece.ucdavis.edu>
	<199606141842.LAA07706@monolith.spry.com>
	<m27mtayr93.fsf@deanna.miranova.com>
	<199606142253.PAA00233@monolith.spry.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.68)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147124 4497 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:52:04 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:52:04 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: hardaker@ece.ucdavis.edu, ding@ifi.uio.no
Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id QAA22833 for <steve@miranova.com>; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 16:32:07 -0700
Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@deanna.miranova.com [206.190.83.1]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <BAA11955@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 15 Jun 1996 01:15:51 +0200
Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id QAA21080; Fri, 14 Jun 1996 16:15:00 -0700
Original-To: wmperry@spry.com
X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/
Mail-Copies-To: never
In-Reply-To: William Perry's message of 14 Jun 1996 15:53:11 -0700
Original-Lines: 21
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.17/XEmacs 19.14
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6707
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6707

>>>>> "William" == William Perry <wmperry@monolith.spry.com> writes:

> Steven L. Baur writes:
William> ;; comments go here.
>> We must have this function in Gnus 5.2.
 ...
William>   Definitely!  Also, there should be an after-change-function
William> that will smilify a buffer as you type, ala MS Word.

Smilifying a buffer twice should not produce doubled copies of the
images.

There should also be an unsmilify-buffer since the smiley regular
expressions seem prone to match XEmacs lisp backtraces and uuencoded
files.

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur
Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour.
Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone
except you in November.