From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/57004 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chris Green Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: emulating mozilla's Label command Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 15:14:31 -0400 Organization: have you seen my office? Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <4noepxs0fo.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> <87n05hnny5.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> <4nad1fq4ja.fsf@b2-25-3.bwh.harvard.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081883794 15552 80.91.224.253 (13 Apr 2004 19:16:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2004 19:16:34 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M5544@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Apr 13 21:16:25 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BDTOS-000704-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:16:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BDTMx-0003ZS-00; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:14:51 -0500 Original-Received: from util2.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.23]) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1BDTMt-0003ZN-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:14:47 -0500 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by util2.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BDTMp-0000T2-LJ for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:14:43 -0500 Original-Received: from main.gmane.org (main.gmane.org [80.91.224.249]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EAC03A0037 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 14:14:38 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BDTMj-0006Q3-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:14:37 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-151-196-19-226.balt.east.verizon.net ([151.196.19.226]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:14:37 +0200 Original-Received: from cmg by pool-151-196-19-226.balt.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 13 Apr 2004 21:14:37 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 36 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-151-196-19-226.balt.east.verizon.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cnez5kItIOkJ95z4eLpZ/NALD1g= Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57004 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:57004 Ted Zlatanov writes: > > On the other hand, if people want to trim the registry by age, that's > a different function, but it's still doable. Let's see first if > there's interest in storing labels in the registry :) I'm interested. I composed a reply then machine crashed. I glanced at the registry and it seems separating out the parent threading functions from what directories the registry actually watches might be desirable. My thinking there is I'd want to watch every single folder for labeling.It doesn't matter much to me since I don't split much within gnus. Rough outline of what needs to be done: insert label(s) in registry allow display of labels outside of *Summary* label commands for *Summary*/*Article* allow display of labels outside of *Summary* allow display of labels in *Summary* It looks like the registry cache's enough to make the display of labels straight from the registry easy. Would the searching of the registry for all things having a "label" data be prohibitive? Doing all that seems to be easier than shoving marks into the backend and seems to have the benfit of not having to make sure labels get reassociated with articles across folders. Certainly better than my bookmark style ideas ;) -- Chris Green Laugh and the world laughs with you, snore and you sleep alone.