From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/16252 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: SL Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Not a timetable Date: 24 Aug 1998 18:15:15 -0700 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <873eaz4yov.fsf@slowfox.do.uunet.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035155150 26614 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:05:50 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:05:50 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gwyn.tux.org (gwyn.tux.org [207.96.122.8]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA06533 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:17:44 -0700 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by gwyn.tux.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA00215 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:19:00 -0400 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAK00499; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:18:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:18:10 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id UAA00476 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 20:17:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@altair.xemacs.org [206.190.83.19]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id VAA21453 for ; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 21:16:37 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.9.1/8.9.1) id SAA06491; Mon, 24 Aug 1998 18:15:15 -0700 Mail-Copies-To: never Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: (:YAD@JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$ ,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3 Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l writes in ding@gnus.org: >>>>>> "Rat" == Stainless Steel Rat writes: Rat> C-d and C-u are not 25-50% of the footprint of vi. > Without wishing to defend MULE, I doubt it represents that fraction of > Emacs 20.3's footprint. For comparison: with current XEmacs, I see a 19% binary size increase and a 16% increase of VM footprint when Mule is compiled in.