From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9836
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: feature suggestion, if I can remember it.
Date: 08 Feb 1997 10:22:41 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2sp37ejoe.fsf@proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no>
References: <qk2k9onwt0y.fsf@iptsun2.unil.ch>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149800 20841 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:36:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:36:40 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2])
	by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id BAA21601
	for <steve@miranova.com>; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 01:52:45 -0800
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@xyplex34.uio.no [129.240.154.54]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <KAA03168@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 10:40:02 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id KAA13576; Sat, 8 Feb 1997 10:22:48 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Wes Hardaker's message of 05 Feb 1997 09:34:21 +0100
Original-Lines: 18
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.12/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9836
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9836

Wes Hardaker <Wesley.Hardaker@sphys.unil.ch> writes:

> I thought it would be cool to have user definable group params.  For
> instance, you could define the parameter 'my-personal-parameter' to
> map to some more regular parameter expression (ie, ((display all)
> (dummy (progn run-mucho-stuffo)) ...)).  This way, for users that have
> a lot of groups which should be marked similarily, they don't have to
> put them all in one topic if they don't want to, but yet its still
> easy to add and maintain a common set of group parameters by rolling
> your own.  You wouldn't have to change it in every group you were
> using to make a change!

Hm...  Metaparameters.  Is this really necessary now that we have
topic parameters?

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen