Re:Was that last release OK?

Re:Was that last release OK?

[Brent B. Powers]

A number of questions (and I'm not even grumpy):

1.)  Where does gnus-article-push-button get it's default action from?
No, let me change that.  Where are the gnus-data and gnus-callback
properties defined?  

2.)  There are times when I want button-2 to call wget, others when I
want to call netscape, still others when I have nothing better to do
and want to call Arena (OK, that last one's a lie, but you get the
idea).  Any way of accomplishing this?

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

"Brent B. Powers" <powers@ml.com> writes:

> 1.)  Where does gnus-article-push-button get it's default action from?
> No, let me change that.  Where are the gnus-data and gnus-callback
> properties defined?  

Buttonizing is controlled by `gnus-button-alist'.

> 2.)  There are times when I want button-2 to call wget, others when I
> want to call netscape, still others when I have nothing better to do
> and want to call Arena (OK, that last one's a lie, but you get the
> idea).  Any way of accomplishing this?

Perhaps pop-up menus on the buttons might be nice.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen

Was that last release OK?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Maintaining development directories on two machines (one of which is a
dynamic PPP thingie) is a drag.  I've spanked the release scripts
further, and I think things should be ok now.  (Except for that
doubled "is released" in the ChangeLog.  *sigh*

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Lars Balker Rasmussen]

Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no> writes:
> Maintaining development directories on two machines (one of which is a
> dynamic PPP thingie) is a drag.  I've spanked the release scripts
> further, and I think things should be ok now.  (Except for that
> doubled "is released" in the ChangeLog.  *sigh*

Well, apart from 5.4.x still being available as rgnus.tar.gz (which may
be a feature), the 5.4.5 release seems to be ok.

So, for how long do you intend to release two versions a day? :-)
-- 
Lars Balker Rasmussen                   <URL:http://www.daimi.aau.dk/~gnort/>

			     Wind the frog!

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen]

Lars Balker Rasmussen <gnort@daimi.aau.dk> writes:

> Well, apart from 5.4.x still being available as rgnus.tar.gz (which may
> be a feature), the 5.4.5 release seems to be ok.

It's a feature.

> So, for how long do you intend to release two versions a day? :-)

The releases have had more to do with testing out the scripts than
fixing bugs, really, so I expect things to slow *way* down to just one
release a day.  :-)

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>:

> Lars Balker Rasmussen <gnort@daimi.aau.dk> writes:

>> So, for how long do you intend to release two versions a day? :-)

> The releases have had more to do with testing out the scripts than
> fixing bugs, really, so I expect things to slow *way* down to just one
> release a day.  :-)

And that is a 100% decrease.  No mean feat!

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Per Abrahamsen]

Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

> And that is a 100% decrease.  No mean feat!

Just a 50% decrease, I would hope.

Re: Was that last release OK?

[Steinar Bang]

>>>>> Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk>:

> Steinar Bang <sb@metis.no> writes:

>> And that is a 100% decrease.  No mean feat!

> Just a 50% decrease, I would hope.

Of course.  If it had been an increase of the same number of bytes, it
would have been 100%, tho'