From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80157
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: David Engster <deng@randomsample.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Gnus, IMAP and Zimbra
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:08:03 +0200
Message-ID: <m2ty7pjcho.fsf@ibookg4-c2.pc.gwdg.de>
References: <87y5x1cdx6.fsf@jdeb.enovance.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1317722936 13992 80.91.229.12 (4 Oct 2011 10:08:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 10:08:56 +0000 (UTC)
To: ding@gnus.org
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M28451@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Oct 04 12:08:51 2011
Return-path: <ding-owner+M28451@lists.math.uh.edu>
Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org
Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18])
	by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M28451@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1RB1vf-0004iY-4i
	for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:08:51 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <ding-owner+M28451@lists.math.uh.edu>)
	id 1RB1v4-0004Vu-Ev; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:08:14 -0500
Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32])
	by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.63)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1RB1v3-0004Vi-F1
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:08:13 -0500
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51])
	by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
	(Exim 4.76)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1RB1v2-0004sw-1s
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 05:08:13 -0500
Original-Received: from randomsample.de ([83.169.19.17])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1RB1uz-0004ae-IV
	for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:08:09 +0200
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=randomsample.de; s=a;
	h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From; bh=x6OxMlTKgVlf2zbnKSttmlqBieqWXvDTmSheMtWWxQY=;
	b=tGnVHwVHj44yjJnoKLTI6FLFcJD8K6TALdR3XlPvFCb69cr7lL3659zC9wkxAMcC5n88F+yDEJr0RpRamKUvBUoWu9ASd7Ocvzidnn3rbwUyhgnmwX49ObsWcT2e3Wo6;
Original-Received: from ibookg4-c2.pc.gwdg.de ([134.76.4.219])
	by randomsample.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.72)
	(envelope-from <deng@randomsample.de>)
	id 1RB1uz-0001xG-2b
	for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 12:08:09 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87y5x1cdx6.fsf@jdeb.enovance.com> (Julien Danjou's message of
	"Tue, 04 Oct 2011 11:19:01 +0200")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110018 (No Gnus v0.18) Emacs/24.0.90 (darwin)
Mail-Copies-To: never
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Spam-Score: -2.5 (--)
List-ID: <ding.gnus.org>
Precedence: bulk
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:80157
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/80157>

Julien Danjou writes:
> Anyone having some issues using the IMAP server from Zimbra with Gnus?
>
> It's totally unreliable here. It misses new mails, and sometimes show
> weird new messages number. Pressing M-g on a group resolve the issue,
> but basically 'g' is unreliable.
>
> Not sure how to dig this out right now, so asking first. :)

I remember Zimbra popping up here before, but mainly because of problems
with the 'unread' count. It seems Zimbra produces very weird and LARGE
article numbers (which is perfectly legal, as long as they are
ascending). But I think Lars tested Zimbra when he did the nnimap
rewrite?

-David