From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9630 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Catchup command request Date: 26 Jan 1997 11:50:03 -0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.100) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149624 19557 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:33:44 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:33:44 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id LAA22165 for ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 11:57:35 -0800 Original-Received: from altair.xemacs.org (steve@xemacs.miranova.com [206.190.83.19]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 20:39:01 +0100 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id LAA03361; Sun, 26 Jan 1997 11:50:03 -0800 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: #!T9!#9s-3o8)*uHlX{Ug[xW7E7Wr!*L46-OxqMu\xz23v|R9q}lH?cRS{rCNe^'[`^sr5" f8*@r4ipO6Jl!:Ccqp:9I OSS'2{-)-4wBnVeg0S\O4Al@)uC[pD|+ X-Attribution: sb In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 25 Jan 1997 09:04:48 +0100 Original-Lines: 24 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.1/XEmacs 20.0 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9630 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9630 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Steven L Baur writes: >> May I respectfully request that the c) atchup command in the *Summary* >> buffer use yes-or-no-p instead of y-or-n-p? >> >> Yes, I just destroyed another nnml group by typing `cd ' in XEmacs >> when I thought an xterm had keyboard focus :-(. > Can't you just press `M-C-_' in the group buffer to undo the change? Um, I didn't know about that command. Thanks. It undoes more than just the last catchup, but it's better than the alternative. I still think it should be made harder to hit catchup since y-or-n-p is so stupid (SPC as a synonym for `y' is unfortunate). > (That is, if undoing has started working now. It hasn't been tested > much, and I suspect that's because not many people are aware of the > command... -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be billed at $250/message.