From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/84372 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rainer M Krug Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Email encryption with S/MIME or OpenPGP? Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:31:29 +0100 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395131577 24986 80.91.229.3 (18 Mar 2014 08:32:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 08:32:57 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M32618@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Mar 18 09:33:04 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpSJ-0007Yl-Jn for ding-account@gmane.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:33:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpRT-0002Jv-9k; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 03:32:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpRQ-0002Jj-6X for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 03:32:08 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpRF-0000tG-C3 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 03:32:07 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpRD-0007Fz-BJ for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:31:55 +0100 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WPpRB-0006FU-6J for ding@gnus.org; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:31:53 +0100 Original-Received: from arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net ([88.186.171.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:31:53 +0100 Original-Received: from Rainer by arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 18 Mar 2014 09:31:53 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 40 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: arn78-1-88-186-171-7.fbx.proxad.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:dFJsed6yPRQ4rj1h+kHr01+/ULw= X-Spam-Score: -0.5 (/) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:84372 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi At the moment I am using OpenPGP to sign and encrypt my emails, but this does not work easily on my iPhone (please tell me otherwise if it does?). But the iPhone implements S/MIME encryption. Now what are the advantages of using each as a standard signing / encryption? Which one is better / safer? I have OpenPGP working via gnus on a Mac and am happy with it.=20 So - what are others using and why? Should I use S/MIME instead? Cheers, Rainer =2D-=20 Rainer M. Krug email: RMKruggmailcom --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.22 (Darwin) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTKARlAAoJENvXNx4PUvmCipUH/A1qpqG+AGVfAC0KiZy2b3mD +XHSkyiXe0oaTC8ry6KGSoduBBzEA/bPV+TVlIReYLicZvvVA8s+2TFaanV+bV94 gAc7EZB97lOZVJlsoY7ixFkTQ2m4HGYtNu+e0HiHC74INQI3aNmqck57suX8WiZo TuMoof1KW7T2/da7KDxSuKDiQKysNuW8ly6rg6KmfYkOeLytTPwbZDhLcg1oFUnu Kk1T+CR0XFBJGkM8/8t+DShvCVNWTf5avb1lDqqUaeF5R/cW4jqZFmF8mceBNCXm k+OYdWIx0eiSDySrNyV+1iDKHtlgbCPoOh/OP4hFsoNFUfgO+y5tI7bet33RucY= =6a0F -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--