Re: split-fancy and gnus-registry confusion

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]

/ Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> was heard to say:
| On Thu, 21 Feb 2008 12:09:24 -0500 Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: 
|
| NW> If I put the cursor in that message and run 
| NW> (gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent), it returns "nil", as I'd expect.
|
| NW> But if I do B t, I get:
|
| NW> (: gnus-registry-split-fancy-with-parent)
| NW> "misc"
| NW> (: nwalsh-incoming-group)
| NW> "archive.2008-02"
|
| NW> which I find totally baffling. Where is that 'misc' coming from?
|
| NW> Note that gnus-registry-track-extra is nil.
|
| NW> Any clues you can provide would be most helpful.
|
| Just from what you've described, I have no idea, sorry.  If you can
| re-run your example with the new registry changes, I could try to
| understand what happened.

I have the new code, I think. I updated from CVS and the patch seemed
to have already been applied.

I set gnus-verbosity to 9 and tried "B" "t" on the offending message,
but didn't get any useful feedback. Is there something else I should
have done?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | There has never been a perfect
http://nwalsh.com/            | government, because men have passions;
                              | and if they did not have passions,
                              | there would be no need for
                              | government.-- Voltaire

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 185 bytes --]