Re: Spam.el: Train in ham?

[Jonas Steverud <tvrud@bredband.net>]

Ted Zlatanov <tzz@lifelogs.com> writes:

> On Fri, 16 Apr 2004, tvrud@bredband.net wrote:
>> I probably have missed something; but I've just started to use
>> spam.el according to previous emails and found a problem. How do I
>> tell spam.el to register all my non-spam messages in my non-spam
>> groups as ham?
>
> Batch training is something I will add to spam.el eventually, but
> right now is not available.

OK, it was not batch training I was looking for specifically, it was
any kind of training. Expiable and ancient articles is not sent
through training and since there isn't any "take this article (which
is in a unclassified or ham group) and train it as ham" AFAICT I was a
bit confused.

As I said in an earlier email, adding expired and ancient marks to
ham-marks made it possible to "batch train" bogofilter.

I consider this problem solved but I think there is a feature or a
change of docs that is lacking. I will give any changes to the docs a
thought of how this can be made better. 

>> Currently, all mail I receive is considered spam, which is not very
>> nice. ;-)
>
> I'm not sure why that is, is your mail group a spam group?

This was because I've trained bogofilter on spam but not on ham. That
made it very easy to make it match the spam database.

Once I had started to train on ham it was no longer a problem.

>> BTW, is it already possible or WIBNI one could set
>> ham-process-destination to 'respool or something like that and have
>> the email respooled instead of moving it to the main mail box?
>
> It's already possible, with that exact syntax.  It should work.

Ooh. Nice. I asked since I couldn't find anything about it in the docs.

Thanks. :-)

-- 
(        http://hem.bredband.net/steverud/        !     Wei Wu Wei     )
(        Meaning of U2 Lyrics, Roleplaying        !  To Do Without Do  )