From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/9005
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Danger!  Danger!
Date: 27 Nov 1996 03:18:49 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2viasz3ee.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no>
References: <m2k9r8232g.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no> <qw6hgmcwz28.fsf@esmeralda.enst.fr> <m2g21whgqp.fsf@altair.xemacs.org> <qw6917owsqr.fsf@esmeralda.enst.fr> <rvohgk8v6l.fsf@sdnp5.ucsd.edu>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035149097 15923 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:24:57 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:24:57 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 11038 invoked from smtpd); 27 Nov 1996 02:41:35 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 27 Nov 1996 02:41:34 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp13.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.113]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <DAA23346@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 03:27:51 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.slip.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id DAA24813; Wed, 27 Nov 1996 03:18:52 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: David Moore's message of 26 Nov 1996 12:20:50 -0800
Original-Lines: 22
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.72/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9005
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:9005

David Moore <dmoore@UCSD.EDU> writes:

> 	A variety of things seem to have broken in the summary buffer
> after the rewrite in 0.70 to not use the text-propery-any method.  Now I
> wonder if my bug reports on them got lost. ;-)

Nope; just haven't had time to do anything about it yet.  

This is probably totally unrelated to the "missing ticks" problem,
which is probably totally unrelated to the "phantom article" problem.

*sigh*  You can tell that we're nearing a real release -- you get all
sorts of serious bugs popping up.  :-)

I may have found out what the "missing ticks" problem was --
`gnus-summary-update-info' switched buffers, which isn't a good idea.
Fix in Red Gnus v0.72.  I still have no idea what the "phantom
article" thing is about.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen