From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/8830
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@ifi.uio.no>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Summary name problem
Date: 18 Nov 1996 21:42:14 +0100
Sender: larsi@proletcult.ifi.uio.no
Message-ID: <m2vib3cezd.fsf@proletcult.ifi.uio.no>
References: <t7p6833p34x.fsf@saifr00.ateng.az.honeywell.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035148943 14641 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:22:23 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:22:23 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <ding-request@ifi.uio.no>
Original-Received: (qmail 8891 invoked from smtpd); 18 Nov 1996 21:54:25 -0000
Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@129.240.64.2)
  by deanna.miranova.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 1996 21:54:24 -0000
Original-Received: from proletcult.ifi.uio.no (root@ppp15.larris.ifi.uio.no [129.240.68.115]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) 
	id <WAA06203@ifi.uio.no> for <ding@ifi.uio.no> ; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 22:27:56 +0100
Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by proletcult.ifi.uio.no (8.8.2/8.8.2) id VAA00815; Mon, 18 Nov 1996 21:42:17 +0100
Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no
In-Reply-To: Loren Schall's message of 18 Nov 1996 13:19:42 -0700
Original-Lines: 25
X-Mailer: Red Gnus v0.64/Emacs 19.34
X-Face: &w!^oO<W.WBH]FsTP:P0f9X6M-ygaADlA_)eF$<UwQzj7:C=Gi<a?/_4$LX^@$Qq7-O&XHp
 lDARi8e8iT<(A$LWAZD*xjk^')/wI5nG;1cNB>~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\<y
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8830
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:8830

Loren Schall <schall@saifr00.ateng.az.honeywell.com> writes:

> I found a minor glitch in the way gnus-sum parses the From line of a
> message to fill in the name part of a summary line.  If the From line
> looks like:
> 
>   From: "Loren Schall (x5994)" <schall@ateng.honeywell.com>
> 
> the summary line looks something like:
> 
>   [   0: +x5994              ] Re: Summary name problem

If you want proper parsing, then set `gnus-extract-address-components'
to `mail-extract-address-components'.

> This is because it does a real simple address parse, looking first for
> parentheses then for angle brackets.  I inverted the test (checking for
> angle brackets first, then parentheses).  I'm not sure this is the Right
> Thing (tm), but it seems to work for me.

Well, why not?  I've applied your patch to 0.64.

-- 
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
  larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen