Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Harry Putnam <reader@newsguy.com>
Subject: Re: nnir oddity in group names
Date: 04 Aug 2000 11:19:42 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2wvhwq475.fsf@reader.ptw.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Fri, 4 Aug 2000 17:28:15 +0200"

Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Großjohann) writes:

> On 04 Aug 2000, Harry Putnam wrote:
> 
> > Nnir fails if I enter the group name as in the first (t.awk)
> >    example: comp.unix.questions
> > 
> > And will only work if I use the actual unix style name:
> >    comp/unix/questions
> 
> Hm.  Amazing.  You are talking about entering the group spec, right?
> This parameter that you are asked for when you do C-u G G but not with
> just G G?

Yup, thats the one.
> 
> nnir-run-glimpse calls glimpse like this:
> 
>     glimpse -H $h -W -l -y ... -F "$p;$g" $query
> 
> $h means nnir-glimpse-home, $p means nnir-glimpse-remove-prefix, and
> $g is the group spec that you enter after C-u G G.
> 
> It appears to me that entering `foo.bar' for the group spec will match
> directory names `foo/bar' as well as `fooXbar', say.
> 
> But there is one difference between `t.awk' and `comp.unix.questions':
> the length.  I think there is a rather short length limit on Glimpse
> queries.  Maybe 16 characters?  Or 32?
> 
> Do you think that this might be the problem?  I wish there was a way
> around this, but I don't know of one.

I think  not.  Heres why... further experiments show:

1) C-u G G <gnus;unplugged><RET> <gnu.emacs.gnus> <RET> fails
2) C-u G G <gnus;unplugged><RET> <gnus> <RET> works

So far those two experiments would tend to confirm you hypothesis.. 
read on.

3) C-u G G <gnus;unplugged><RET> <gnu/emacs/gnus> <RET> works
(Same length query string works in number three)

> But maybe I could use grep:
> 
>     glimpse -H $h -W -l -y -F $p $query | grep -e $g
> 
> Do you think that this might help?  Could somebody try this to see if
> it does?
> 
> Another idea might be to use the keep-lines Lisp function to do the
> job of grep.  This might be even better, since call-process might not
> be able to do the pipe thing.

Didn't follow the last two suggestions... sorry.




  reply	other threads:[~2000-08-04 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-04 14:25 Harry Putnam
2000-08-04 15:28 ` Kai Großjohann
2000-08-04 18:19   ` Harry Putnam [this message]
2000-08-10 17:13     ` Kai Großjohann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2wvhwq475.fsf@reader.ptw.com \
    --to=reader@newsguy.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).