From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/14571
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: SL Baur <steve@xemacs.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Can we have a message when agent expiry is finished?
Date: 13 Mar 1998 16:19:29 -0800
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m2wwdy86pa.fsf@altair.xemacs.org>
References: <m34t19s2rc.fsf@lotusland.demon.co.uk> <m3ogzal2er.fsf@sparky.gnus.org> <x7d8fqupx7.fsf@des.castles.com> <kigvhtiqhlo.fsf@jagor.srce.hr>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035153741 16969 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 22:42:21 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 22:42:21 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16])
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id QAA06000
	for <steve@altair.xemacs.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:21:05 -0800
Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31])
	by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id SAA02708
	for <steve@xemacs.org>; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 18:15:49 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAN10554; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 18:51:12 -0600
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 13 Mar 1998 18:15:24 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from claymore.vcinet.com (claymore.vcinet.com [208.205.12.23]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id SAA18597 for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Fri, 13 Mar 1998 18:15:16 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: (qmail 7270 invoked by uid 504); 14 Mar 1998 00:15:06 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 7267 invoked from network); 14 Mar 1998 00:15:05 -0000
Original-Received: from xemacs.miranova.com (HELO altair.xemacs.org) (steve@206.190.83.19)
  by claymore.vcinet.com with SMTP; 14 Mar 1998 00:15:05 -0000
Original-Received: (from steve@localhost)
	by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id QAA05938;
	Fri, 13 Mar 1998 16:19:31 -0800
Mail-Copies-To: never
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
X-Face: (:YAD@JS'&Kz'M}n7eX7gEvPR6U1mJ-kt;asEc2qAv;h{Yw7ckz<7+X_SYeTNAaPui:e~x$
 ,A=gkt*>UPL/}\a/#C~v2%ETiAY_sx;xve0yL??JWTtX_-NUzXyP38UdW#cmN1\4(X!c3m#%IbtB-3
 Z-!xpZi!`E.s{(;aP=b11"!3wQu]1j@^V|;n=B|{l<bZV1.AI`zWV%kPCnUhcgEe\(}/_kNd6,*3ZJ
 Q3o<YQ3^u;7jS=:p0--u3msQO
X-Attribution: sb
In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "14 Mar 1998 00:46:43 +0100"
Original-Lines: 7
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.2/XEmacs 20.5(beta31) - "Myotonic"
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:14571
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:14571

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:

> Why don't you use dormant articles (`?') for this purpose?

I used to do this.  The problem was that they disappear (by default)
and don't reappear unless there is a (properly threaded) response.
Has this changed?