From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/74538 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Francis Moreau Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Improving Gnus speed Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:56:08 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87zktemkwl.fsf@uwo.ca> <87vd42mdci.fsf@uwo.ca> <87r5e555e0.fsf@uwo.ca> <87aaks53my.fsf@uwo.ca> <871v636fri.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1291064230 11203 80.91.229.12 (29 Nov 2010 20:57:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 20:57:10 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22897@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 29 21:57:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PNAmX-0008RH-Oo for ding-account@gmane.org; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:57:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNAmG-0002GD-B4; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:48 -0600 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PNAmD-0002Fv-DU for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:45 -0600 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PNAmC-00038Y-5A for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:56:45 -0600 Original-Received: from mail-wy0-f172.google.com ([74.125.82.172]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PNAmB-0000sg-00 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 21:56:43 +0100 Original-Received: by wyf23 with SMTP id 23so3994899wyf.17 for ; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:cc:subject:references :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=HEs3G/bupUF8etxMs/o1wQpSjsZVUKJGJB/1M43vA1E=; b=mVEVllA4BtRyZrXBGt0/ADEcYIO+Is30/OkjoYOV0vuh0mdZMD+k0RxolUEPgSWs+y knq3q6EWxtn23436mX30+VzhmSXlsSRx5Tmheb1bzPV7oHEZGN5bO0gLKPAnRHtZr2HM K5nu6LDsXLRksxpSfbpgcxKMp/k/6vMHjOSQA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=m5Sm9qbYF/3P81m9JGS3aT2AnB2GmkN+QODi7nAmeqTJ+Z9nLYllXYmhupI9e0Q6Ag brcwN4t0GWJF3z4t3SUWPL9N4wgMBqchce2mN3BlLSHrAxkKVq++7KZEk+EOgbCtkNqC Bh2koPgnYPCw96wlE0HGrsDNc8uXVT82OXSUU= Original-Received: by 10.227.152.17 with SMTP id e17mr6578323wbw.190.1291064172356; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:12 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost (au213-1-82-235-205-153.fbx.proxad.net [82.235.205.153]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h29sm3789739wbc.9.2010.11.29.12.56.10 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 29 Nov 2010 12:56:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <871v636fri.fsf@uwo.ca> (Dan Christensen's message of "Mon, 29 Nov 2010 15:23:13 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Spam-Score: -2.0 (--) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:74538 Archived-At: Dan Christensen writes: > Francis Moreau writes: > >> I would think that you just have to compare the date of all thread *leafs* >> only. > > You can't always assume that the References headers are correct, or that > the Date headers provided are correct, etc. > > Moreover, it doesn't matter, since the dates will be parsed later > anyways. Since the conversion is cached, all of this only affects > when the time is taken to do the conversion, not the total time. > > On my laptop, with 6500 articles, we're only talking about 1.3 seconds, > so this is already pretty good. But I suspect it can be sped up. I agree this is good. But that's no what I get with 1300 *cached* articles. I still have almost 10 seconds to get the summary buffer. I initialy had more than 20 seconds and had to disable the scoring (okay that's pretty useless for my cached groups but still). -- Francis