`S V' behaves differently in Article buffer

`S V' behaves differently in Article buffer

[Leo]

Dear all,

Doing `S V' (gnus-summary-very-wide-reply-with-original) in Article
buffer is different than in summary buffer:

  o  it does not switch to the mail buffer
  o  The minibuffer displays "Mark set" when there seems to be no mark
     set

Best,
-- 
Leo <sdl.web AT gmail.com>                         (GPG Key: 9283AA3F)

Re: `S V' behaves differently in Article buffer

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>> In <m2y7i8iady.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk> Leo wrote:
> Dear all,

> Doing `S V' (gnus-summary-very-wide-reply-with-original) in Article
> buffer is different than in summary buffer:

>   o  it does not switch to the mail buffer
>   o  The minibuffer displays "Mark set" when there seems to be no mark
>      set

It seems to be a side effect of the change that I made in 5 Jun
by your report. ;-)  I'll fix it ASAP.

cf. http://news.gmane.org/group/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/thread=64748

Re: `S V' behaves differently in Article buffer

[Katsumi Yamaoka]

>>>>>> In <m2y7i8iady.fsf@sl392.st-edmunds.cam.ac.uk> Leo wrote:

>> Doing `S V' (gnus-summary-very-wide-reply-with-original) in Article
>> buffer is different than in summary buffer:

>>   o  it does not switch to the mail buffer

Fixed in the trunk.  In addition, incomplete summary command keys
followed by `C-h' now invoke `describe-bindings' as usual.  Try
`S C-h' for example in the article buffer.

In addition, I've fixed a bug that prevents XEmacs from working.
(The third argument of `pop-to-buffer' is incompatible between
Emacs and XEmacs.)

>>   o  The minibuffer displays "Mark set" when there seems to be no mark
>>      set

Mark exists at the end (or possibly the beginning) of the yanked
message.  Setting a mark is necessary to make the cite function
(which is specified by the `message-cite-function' variable) work.