* Default binding for TAB in summary buffer?
@ 1996-11-10 2:03 Hrvoje Niksic
1996-11-10 4:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Hrvoje Niksic @ 1996-11-10 2:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
I see that TAB is not bound to anything meaningful to Gnus in the
summary buffer. How about binding it to gnus-summary-next-unread by
default? It would do us no harm, and yet it would mean a lot to
former tin/knews addicts.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
The end of the world is coming... SAVE YOUR BUFFERS!
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: Default binding for TAB in summary buffer?
1996-11-10 2:03 Default binding for TAB in summary buffer? Hrvoje Niksic
@ 1996-11-10 4:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen @ 1996-11-10 4:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@srce.hr> writes:
> I see that TAB is not bound to anything meaningful to Gnus in the
> summary buffer. How about binding it to gnus-summary-next-unread by
> default? It would do us no harm, and yet it would mean a lot to
> former tin/knews addicts.
I'd rather not waste a potentially useful key by binding it to
something that we already have a binding for. TAB may become a handy
key to have in the future.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@ifi.uio.no * Lars Ingebrigtsen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1996-11-10 4:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1996-11-10 2:03 Default binding for TAB in summary buffer? Hrvoje Niksic
1996-11-10 4:20 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).