Gnus development mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur)
Subject: Re: Adaptive score and highlighting?
Date: 16 Nov 1995 10:18:42 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ybtgfmnx.fsf@diana.miranova.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: konmsll@eua.ericsson.se's message of 15 Nov 1995 00:56:08 -0800

>>>>> "Mats" == Mats Lidell <konmsll@eua.ericsson.se> writes:

    Mats> Hi, I'm using the default adaption rules and I then get
    Mats> authors highlighted if I just read them once (!?) Or they
    Mats> are "lowered" if just a score of "-1" is attached to them.

    Mats> I dont' like this. Is there some way to get "highlight" when
    Mats> above some score (say 10) and "dimmed" when lower another
    Mats> score (say -10) so that small random changes won't trigger
    Mats> highlighting.

Nope.  You may set the default score, but you may not specify a
default score range.  That's a good idea though.

    Mats> I think there is a general problem also involved with this
    Mats> type of mechanism. Authors that once get "highlighted" will
    Mats> get their score increased because you must read him again
    Mats> because he is highlighted.

This is a problem.  The effect (which I've seen for as long as I've
been using Gnus) is that if you are unfortunate enough to read a
spammed article, subsequent copies you see (by default) will have
their scores raised.

I've found various workarounds using adaptive scoring.  First off,
when you leave a group, the scoring information is based on the mark
the article has.  Let's say you read an article, and are less than
pleased with the author or thread.  If you C-k or d after reading,
then the article (and author) will get a reduced score in the adaptive
scoring.  Note that the values by which the score gets reduced is
controlled by the gnus-default-adaptive-score-alist variable.

    Mats> I guess there is no solution to
    Mats> this other than to remove his score when you find out that
    Mats> this author doens't deserve that score. But then how do you
    Mats> do that in a controlled maner. Lower on author?

If you want to nuke the author, then lower on author will do nicely.
The worst offenders though, seem to have a propensity for varying
their from lines, so you will have to be clever about it.

-- 
steve@miranova.com baur


  reply	other threads:[~1995-11-16 18:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1995-11-15  8:56 Mats Lidell
1995-11-16 18:18 ` Steven L. Baur [this message]
1995-11-16 20:13 ` Per Abrahamsen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=m2ybtgfmnx.fsf@diana.miranova.com \
    --to=steve@miranova.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).