From: steve@miranova.com (Steven L. Baur)
Subject: Re: Adaptive score and highlighting?
Date: 16 Nov 1995 10:18:42 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ybtgfmnx.fsf@diana.miranova.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: konmsll@eua.ericsson.se's message of 15 Nov 1995 00:56:08 -0800
>>>>> "Mats" == Mats Lidell <konmsll@eua.ericsson.se> writes:
Mats> Hi, I'm using the default adaption rules and I then get
Mats> authors highlighted if I just read them once (!?) Or they
Mats> are "lowered" if just a score of "-1" is attached to them.
Mats> I dont' like this. Is there some way to get "highlight" when
Mats> above some score (say 10) and "dimmed" when lower another
Mats> score (say -10) so that small random changes won't trigger
Mats> highlighting.
Nope. You may set the default score, but you may not specify a
default score range. That's a good idea though.
Mats> I think there is a general problem also involved with this
Mats> type of mechanism. Authors that once get "highlighted" will
Mats> get their score increased because you must read him again
Mats> because he is highlighted.
This is a problem. The effect (which I've seen for as long as I've
been using Gnus) is that if you are unfortunate enough to read a
spammed article, subsequent copies you see (by default) will have
their scores raised.
I've found various workarounds using adaptive scoring. First off,
when you leave a group, the scoring information is based on the mark
the article has. Let's say you read an article, and are less than
pleased with the author or thread. If you C-k or d after reading,
then the article (and author) will get a reduced score in the adaptive
scoring. Note that the values by which the score gets reduced is
controlled by the gnus-default-adaptive-score-alist variable.
Mats> I guess there is no solution to
Mats> this other than to remove his score when you find out that
Mats> this author doens't deserve that score. But then how do you
Mats> do that in a controlled maner. Lower on author?
If you want to nuke the author, then lower on author will do nicely.
The worst offenders though, seem to have a propensity for varying
their from lines, so you will have to be clever about it.
--
steve@miranova.com baur
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1995-11-16 18:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1995-11-15 8:56 Mats Lidell
1995-11-16 18:18 ` Steven L. Baur [this message]
1995-11-16 20:13 ` Per Abrahamsen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2ybtgfmnx.fsf@diana.miranova.com \
--to=steve@miranova.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).