From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6792 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sudish Joseph Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: article series (was: yet more Gnus questions & problems) Date: 18 Jun 1996 21:50:58 -0400 Sender: sj@mindspring.com Message-ID: References: <199606140448.AAA11991@csb.bu.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035147196 4749 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:53:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:53:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@ifi.uio.no Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA27817 for ; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 19:16:49 -0700 Original-Received: from atreides.erehwon.org (sj@user-168-121-167-78.dialup.mindspring.com [168.121.167.78]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Wed, 19 Jun 1996 03:47:37 +0200 Original-Received: (from sj@localhost) by atreides.erehwon.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id VAA00372; Tue, 18 Jun 1996 21:50:59 -0400 Original-To: Joe Wells In-Reply-To: Joe Wells's message of 18 Jun 1996 19:21:31 -0400 Original-Lines: 13 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.2.12/Emacs 19.31 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6792 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6792 Joe Wells writes: > I read the above paragraph several times and it still doesn't make any > sense to me. What does your reasoning have to do with whether to save > killed mail groups so that they can be inspected with "A k"? Well, I remember being happy when they were taken off the killed list...it was damned hard to get rid of them. :-) I had to edit the eld file. I did so because I was afraid of name clashes -- unlike USENET, it is not guaranteed that the name of a killed mail group will not show up as a new group. Whether this is poisonous in itself is known to God and Lars. -Sudish