From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/6071 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Steven L Baur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Picking Nits (sgnus v0.79/tm7.52) Date: 28 Apr 1996 11:02:21 -0700 Sender: steve@miranova.com Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.52) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035146581 2431 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 20:43:01 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 20:43:01 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: ding-request@ifi.uio.no Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA17975 for ; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 11:28:40 -0700 Original-Received: from deanna.miranova.com (steve@miranova.com [204.212.162.100]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 20:02:07 +0200 Original-Received: (from steve@localhost) by deanna.miranova.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) id LAA17541; Sun, 28 Apr 1996 11:02:22 -0700 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Url: http://www.miranova.com/%7Esteve/ Mail-Copies-To: never In-Reply-To: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen's message of 28 Apr 1996 03:09:44 -0700 Original-Lines: 29 X-Mailer: September Gnus v0.79/XEmacs 19.14 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6071 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:6071 >>>>> "lmi" == Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: lmi> Steven L Baur writes: >> 2. I don't care for the sequence of events when one selects a mail >> response function. The subject prompt comes first, and the text >> is poorly worded -- it should just ask for a Subject:. The >> currently selected article then disappears. Very often I end up >> splitting the frame and putting the *Article ... buffer in the >> other window. This is what Gnus used to do, and I guess I miss >> it. The least you could do would be to make the *Article* buffer >> be the default target for C-X 4 b or C-X 5 b ... This is poorly worded, let me rephrase the first part. lmi> Uhm... Are you ever prompted for anything when using message.el? I lmi> thought those prompts had gone the ways of the dinosaurs. What lmi> commands prompt? Type ``m'' while in the summary buffer. I then get a prompt ``Empty Subject enter value'', then get plopped in the message-mode buffer sitting on the To: line. This goes exactly backwards to what I've been accustomed to. I would expect a prompt for To: first, then Subject:. -- steve@miranova.com baur Unsolicited commercial e-mail will be proofread for $250/hour. Andrea Seastrand: For your vote on the Telecom bill, I will vote for anyone except you in November.