From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/54775
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jorge Godoy <godoy@ieee.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: PGG default values
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:53:26 -0200
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m31xsghrnd.fsf@ieee.org>
References: <m3n0b6wn7d.fsf@troodon.stanford.edu>
	<ilun0b6p4q6.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<13408.1068408992@chicory.stanford.edu>
	<ilusmkxnrlq.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<ilufzgxnqxg.fsf_-_@latte.josefsson.org> <m3r80gi7gf.fsf@ieee.org>
	<ilu3ccwmc1s.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1068497732 9087 80.91.224.253 (10 Nov 2003 20:55:32 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2003 20:55:32 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: "Satyaki Das" <satyakid@stanford.edu>
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3316@lists.math.uh.edu Mon Nov 10 21:55:23 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M3316@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 1AJJ4F-0003P3-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 21:55:23 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AJJ41-0002b9-00; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:55:09 -0600
Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 1AJJ3w-0002b4-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:55:04 -0600
Original-Received: from panda.sul.com.br (panda.sul.com.br [200.219.150.4])
	by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFBD83A004B
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 14:55:00 -0600 (CST)
Original-Received: from wintermute.g2ctech (200-103-130-085.ctame7044.dsl.brasiltelecom.net.br [200.103.130.85])
	by panda.sul.com.br (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id B188E326E3; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:54:01 -0200 (EDT)
Original-Received: by wintermute.g2ctech (Postfix, from userid 500)
	id 0DEDB84132; Mon, 10 Nov 2003 18:53:26 -0200 (BRST)
Original-To: ding <ding@gnus.org>
X-URL: <http://www.g2ctech.com/>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-Disclaimer: Unless explicitly stated, opinions on this message are
 strictly mine
In-Reply-To: <ilu3ccwmc1s.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (Simon Josefsson's
 message of "Mon, 10 Nov 2003 17:19:11 +0100")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux)
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54775
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:54775

Simon Josefsson <jas@extundo.com> writes:

> Right, but do most users enable this?  Is it enabled by default by
> GnuPG?  If so, requesting encrypt-for-me again should be harmless, so
> wouldn't cause any problems.  If not, people might send encrypted
> messages they can't read later on, which is bad.  So I only see
> advantages with a default value of t, but no disadvantages.

IIRC, the default is off. The reasoning was on the documentation (I
think... It's been a lot of time since I read it fully). 

> Thanks for your opinion.  So now we have suggestions for ~5 minutes
> and ~10 minutes, if I recall correctly.

This is what I've read too... 

-- 
Godoy.     <godoy@ieee.org>