From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/46214 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Paul Graham on fighting SPAM Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:57:45 -0400 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87d6sf42ys.fsf@emacswiki.org> <871y8u7un8.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87fzxa7ala.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87d6se9dsy.fsf@emacswiki.org> <87vg637hvh.fsf@emacswiki.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1030035303 19930 127.0.0.1 (22 Aug 2002 16:55:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2002 16:55:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ding@gnus.org Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 17hvEa-0005BL-00 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 18:55:00 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 17hvF3-0001Qc-00; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:55:29 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:56:00 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id LAA00941 for ; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 11:55:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: (qmail 17567 invoked by alias); 22 Aug 2002 16:55:12 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 17562 invoked from network); 22 Aug 2002 16:55:12 -0000 Original-Received: from ns3.beld.net (208.229.215.83) by gnus.org with SMTP; 22 Aug 2002 16:55:12 -0000 Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (dhcp-0-50-8b-df-51-5e.cpe.beld.net [65.202.179.253]) by ns3.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F9393B954; Thu, 22 Aug 2002 12:55:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Alex Schroeder X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: Alex Schroeder , ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 24 User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.2 (i386-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46214 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:46214 On Thu, 22 Aug 2002, tzz@lifelogs.com wrote: > Those articles have the spam-mark. I think > gnus-spam-stat-process-buffer looks like the right function to call > on articles marked as spam; is there a corresponding function (or > reuse of this one) to process articles that are *not* spam? How do > you want to handle the file setting for the word table - should it > be a string passed to a setup function on your side, or should we > keep it in your code and tell users to customize it? Whoops. I was looking at an older version of your code by accident. Your message makes a lot more sense with version 0.04 :) The functions you have are great, we just need to figure out how to preserve the state of an article marked as spam, for the spam<->not_spam transitions, or to go with the original idea of expiring all spam mail that's been processed already. For new incoming spam, should we *also* run the spam analysis on a buffer that we think is spam, or is the spam analysis only for buffers that the user explicitly marks as spam? -- Teodor Zlatanov "Brevis oratio penetrat colos, longa potatio evacuat ciphos." -Rabelais