From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/36070 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Jason R. Mastaler" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: my 'dated' address (was Re: Quimby Upgrade) Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 13:54:41 -0600 (MDT) Message-ID: References: <20010412214301.13340.qmail@nightshade.acl.lanl.gov> <01Apr27.154830edt.115489@gateway.intersys.com> <20010427160208.C17435@kens.com> <01Apr27.170545edt.115524@gateway.intersys.com> <01Apr27.173712edt.115316@gateway.intersys.com> <87k843bte7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171718 6606 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:41:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:41:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 5323 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2001 19:54:48 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 5318 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2001 19:54:47 -0000 Original-Received: from localhost (HELO nightshade.la.mastaler.com) (jason@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 29 Apr 2001 19:54:47 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 13809 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2001 19:54:42 -0000 Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Copies-To: never X-Face: "Whz7py/hGVg+:}u&Q$/5z>j)gy%qNRX{j]0xGF&?Z"^b3`[6dY'^jSDlZDHh$m1~YX6U3J 1gOce%&je3)lVMOa/P,=9Kj:lmZb6]1hMmam*SW$GrVPa>b05y9/svb[uX.i><]^; iE1^(p_*=eLQJ6g$[aOX9I#`DCP\^O=RR:7|95hZ In-Reply-To: <87k843bte7.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (Florian Weimer's message of "29 Apr 2001 17:46:56 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.4 (Solid Vapor) X-Delivery-Agent: TMDA v0.11/Python 2.1 Original-Lines: 17 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36070 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:36070 Florian Weimer writes: > I run several small lists with Mailman, and apart from some strange > issues (administrative requests are put into some sort of queue which > has to be processed regularly by a cron job, the Sender: header on > administrative messages causes problems with a commonly used agent), > it operates quite nicely. > > However, I've not tried to run really big lists using it. I'm running a 5,000 member list under Mailman and haven't had any problems. Also, sourceforge uses Mailman to manage over 10,000 lists, which is a pretty good measure of its scalability. -- (TMDA - http://tmda.sourceforge.net/) (OSI-certified SPAM reduction system)