From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/33816 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stainless Steel Rat Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Disable generation of "Sender: " by default. Date: 20 Dec 2000 15:05:56 -0500 Organization: The Happy Fun Ball Brigade Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169852 27099 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:10:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:10:52 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9D5CD049D for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:06:54 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB13617; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:06:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:05:53 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged)) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id OAA06667 for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 14:05:37 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from peorth.gweep.net (h0060978d8c91.ne.mediaone.net [24.147.75.115]) by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4F60BD049D for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:06:03 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from ratinox@localhost) by peorth.gweep.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA07687; Wed, 20 Dec 2000 15:05:56 -0500 Original-To: "(ding)" X-Attribution: Rat In-Reply-To: Toby Speight's message of "20 Dec 2000 10:48:16 +0000" Original-Lines: 14 User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33816 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:33816 * Toby Speight on Wed, 20 Dec 2000 | This is pretty much how I see it, too - except that it's impossible | in general for the software to know how to find the user's "local" | mailbox. In the case of RFC 822 this is correct. In the case of RFC 1036... it is not an RFC 822 mailbox but user@local.fqdn. Which is not reliable. Which is why I say that RFC 1036 and son of are broken when it comes to Sender. -- Rat \ Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball. Minion of Nathan - Nathan says Hi! \ PGP Key: at a key server near you! \