From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/26648 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: `name' parameter for MIME attachments? Date: 25 Sep 1999 10:31:33 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035163818 20529 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:30:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:30:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from lisa.math.uh.edu (lisa.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.49]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19136 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:47:17 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by lisa.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB06075; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:47:13 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:47:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id JAA06020 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 09:46:26 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (quimbies.gnus.org [193.69.4.148]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA19087 for ; Thu, 11 Nov 1999 10:45:56 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA30892; Sat, 25 Sep 1999 10:31:55 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Stereolab's _Cobra and Phases Group Play Voltage in the Milky Night_: "Blips Drips and Strips" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Toby Speight's message of "07 Sep 1999 12:46:04 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > "name" isn't a valid parameter for application/postscript. Well, RFC2046 says that the "name" parameter is commonly used in the Content-Type header, so I don't think it's invalid. However, it says that it is deprecated in favour of the Content-Disposition header, so I think that Gnus does the right thing. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen