From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/22080 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Wierdness with 0.80 Date: 28 Mar 1999 17:15:37 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035160065 26244 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:27:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:27:45 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from farabi.math.uh.edu (farabi.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.57]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26665 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:37:53 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by farabi.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAB17598; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:37:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:37:28 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id JAA05322 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 09:35:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (larsi@ppp088.uio.no [129.240.240.93]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id KAA26496 for ; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 10:35:42 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA01892; Sun, 28 Mar 1999 17:35:03 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: John Brunner's _Stand on Zanzibar_ X-Now-Playing: Pet Shop Boys's _Before (cd1)_: "Hit and Miss" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Jack Twilley's message of "Thu, 18 Mar 1999 04:30:07 GMT" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070081 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.81) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > My new news comes through, but it's almost all old news. Here's an > example. I had a group with 65 new messages. I looked at them and > then used 'c' to mark them all read. A few minutes later, instead of > 1 new message, I see 66. I go to the group, and the previous 65 are > marked with 'M', which I normally only see for my own posts. The "M" mark is for articles you've read before, so it makes sense that these articles you've read before are marked as such. But that doesn't explain why `c' makes the number of unread articles go up. Is this bug repeatable? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen