From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/18162 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Pterodactyl Gnus v0.39 is released Date: 25 Oct 1998 23:27:22 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156735 4734 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:32:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:32:15 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01663 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:40:52 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB26247; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:40:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:40:20 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA12087 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 16:40:10 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp047.uio.no [129.240.240.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA01625 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 17:40:02 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA31436; Sun, 25 Oct 1998 23:39:56 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: C. J. Cherry's _Finity's End_ X-Now-Playing: Belle & Sebastian's _the Boy With the Arab Strap_: "It Could Have Been a Brilliant Career" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "25 Oct 1998 20:45:33 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070041 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.41) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Yes, but in the file named `gnus-xmas.el' it would be nice to use the > XEmacsish functions. Perhaps that's the XEmacs developer in me > talking. :-) I've changed gnus-xmas back. > > You should coordinate this with RMS. > > I don't see what's there to coordinate. The object is named > `compiled-function', so the predicate is `compiled-function-p'. Like > bufferp or framep or whatever. Perhaps the object should be `byte-code-function' instead? > And this isn't anything new -- compiled functions have been there > since at least 19.12. Besides, I think Common Lisp also has > compiled-function-p. Yes, but in CL this is true for functions that really are compiled, and not just byte-compiled. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen