Re: Bug: gnus-article-treat-body-boundary,

[sigurd@12move.de (Karl Pflästerer)]

On 15 Oct 2003, Reiner Steib <- 4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de wrote:

> when I set `gnus-treat-body-boundary' to t, the boundary isn't placed
> after the headers, but after the first paragraph of the article body.

Yes that's right.

> I don't know whether it's a bug in `gnus-article-treat-body-boundary',
> `gnus-with-article-headers', `article-narrow-to-head' or something
> else.  When I add "(sit-for 3)" in `gnus-article-treat-body-boundary'

I'm also not sure but I think we should start with `gnus-display-mime'
There `gnus-treat-article' gets called and that function calls the
functions from the alist `gnus-treatment-function-alist'.

> as shown below, I see that the article buffer doesn't contain the
> headers (as expected), but the first paragraph of the article.

That's because of gnus-display-mime.

	  (save-restriction
	    (article-goto-body)
	    (narrow-to-region (point) (point-max))
	    (gnus-treat-article nil 1 1)
	    (widen)))
	(unless ihandles
	  ;; Highlight the headers.
	  (save-excursion
	    (save-restriction
	      (article-goto-body)
	      (narrow-to-region (point-min) (point))
	      (gnus-treat-article 'head))))))))


Before `gnus-treat-article' is called the buffer is narrowed.  I'm not
sure at the moment why but it seems necessary.  If I comment it out
nothing happens.

> Any ideas?  (I couldn't locate the code where the gnus-treat-*
> functions are called.)

Perhaps that helps a bit.  I couldn't find at the monent the bug either
but I'll try on.



   KP

-- 
If you have nothing to say on a subject, replying with a line such as,
"I agree with this." puts you in the TO:'s for all future messages, and
establishes you as "one who really cares", if not an actual expert, on
the topic at hand.         -- from the Symbolics Guidelines for Sending Mail