From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/51232 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: How many people mark spam in gmane groups? Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2003 08:20:16 -0500 Organization: =?koi8-r?q?=F4=C5=CF=C4=CF=D2=20=FA=CC=C1=D4=C1=CE=CF=D7?= @ Cienfuegos Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1049549998 3515 80.91.224.249 (5 Apr 2003 13:39:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2003 13:39:58 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Sat Apr 05 15:39:56 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 191ntk-0000u5-00 for ; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 15:39:56 +0200 Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 191nsK-000546-00; Sat, 05 Apr 2003 07:38:28 -0600 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sat, 05 Apr 2003 07:39:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ns2.beld.net (ns2.beld.net [208.229.215.82]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id HAA28549 for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 07:39:22 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from heechee.beld.net (unknown [24.233.82.91]) by ns2.beld.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A335D3BDBE for ; Sat, 5 Apr 2003 08:38:10 -0500 (EST) Original-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6;d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Followup-To: ding@hpc.uh.edu In-Reply-To: (Reiner Steib's message of "Wed, 02 Apr 2003 18:54:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090018 (Oort Gnus v0.18) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51232 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:51232 On Wed, 02 Apr 2003, 4.uce.03.r.s@nurfuerspam.de wrote: > On Wed, Apr 02 2003, Ted Stern wrote: > >> At the moment, this entails me exposing the X-Report-Spam header >> using "C-u g" in the summary buffer, then using browse-url-at-point >> to send the link to my browser. >> Is there some way to automate this a bit more? > > Sure, it's Gnus. :-) > [ code omitted ] > >> It would be nice if there were a single keystroke (say "$ R") to >> report spam. > > I didn't use the above code very often, so I'm not sure if it works > reliable. > > Should we add something like this to Gnus? Opinions? Although spam.el might be too heavyweight for something like this, a spam/ham summary exit processor ("reporter"?) that can use the X-Report-Spam header would work. Then the spam-marked messages could be batch-processed as described above, then copied (not moved!) if spam-process-destination is set for the newsgroup. This would require some changes to spam.el, since it has been used only with mail groups, so it's not a trivial addition. Ted