From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/21624 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Volovich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: \201's Date: 27 Feb 1999 01:27:03 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035159693 23899 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:21:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:21:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20751 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:33:20 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAB16271; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:31:32 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:32:06 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id QAA14387 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 16:31:58 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from ns.vsu.ru (root@ns.vsu.ru [62.76.169.12]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id RAA20710 for ; Fri, 26 Feb 1999 17:31:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by ns.vsu.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id BAA29204 for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:29:04 +0300 Original-Received: (from vvv@localhost) by vvv.vsu.ru (8.8.7/8.8.7) id BAA23486; Sat, 27 Feb 1999 01:27:03 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070079 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.79) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21624 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:21624 Hi, i'm seeing `\201' prefixes before 8-bit iso-8859-1 characters in newsgroups for which the default encoding is iso-8859-1 but there is no "charset" in the header (i did not check whether the situation improves if such CT header is present). was this fixed, and re-appeared recently, or is it a known bug? Best regards, -- Vladimir.