From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20044 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problem with gnus 5.6.45 Date: 30 Dec 1998 10:28:37 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158356 15212 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:59:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:59:16 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA19749 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 11:12:50 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB25956; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:12:34 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:09:51 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id KAA26852 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 10:09:42 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp060.uio.no [129.240.240.61]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA19708 for ; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 11:09:31 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id RAA00875; Wed, 30 Dec 1998 17:09:14 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Joe Keenan's _Putting on the Ritz_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: David Hedbor's message of "28 Dec 1998 23:16:22 -0800" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > After upgrading to the latest version of Gnus 5.6 a while ago, I > started having some problems with drafts/queues. Now it seems like > when I write and send an email while unplugged, I get an empty file in > the drafts folder. Harmless but annoying. This empty file remains after the message has been sent? Does anybody else see this behavior? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen