From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/19304 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: multipart/related test Date: 29 Nov 1998 22:55:57 +0100 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035157678 10915 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:47:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:47:58 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA26059 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 16:47:22 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAB17793; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:47:08 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:47:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA24253 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:46:49 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp047.uio.no [129.240.240.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA26022 for ; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 16:46:38 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id WAA31793; Sun, 29 Nov 1998 22:57:44 +0100 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Greg Bear's _Slant_ X-Now-Playing: Stereolab's _Dots and Loops_: "Diagonals" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "29 Nov 1998 19:56:10 +0100" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070057 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.57) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ Just installed pgnus-0.56 and w3-4.0pre.30 on Emacs 20.3, and this is > what happened: > > ,----- > | Signaling: (wrong-number-of-arguments # 3) > | (buffer-string nil nil (mm-handle-buffer part)) My bad. Emacs 20.3's `buffer-string' doesn't take a BUFFER parameter. Er. How weird. `buffer-string' is an alias for `buffer-substring' in XEmacs 21.2. Has it always been that way? And jere I just convinced RMS to let `buffer-string' take an optional BUFFER parameter in Emacs 20.4, all for naught, it seems... To clarify: In Emacs 20.4, `buffer-substring' takes mandatory START and END params, while `buffer-string' takes an optional BUFFER param. In XEmacs 21.2, there's only one function, which takes three optional params -- start, end, and buffer. I think the Emacs 20.4 thing makes more sense. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen