From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/11284 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Markus Dickebohm Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Using procmail with Gnus Date: 06 Jun 1997 09:46:02 +0200 Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.106) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035151019 29371 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 21:56:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 21:56:59 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from sandy.calag.com (root@sandy [206.190.83.128]) by altair.xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA15180 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 02:53:16 -0700 Original-Received: from xemacs.org (xemacs.cs.uiuc.edu [128.174.252.16]) by sandy.calag.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id CAA25735 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 02:53:24 -0700 Original-Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by xemacs.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id EAA00395 for ; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 04:52:48 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from franck.pc.Uni-Koeln.DE (markus@franck.pc.Uni-Koeln.DE [134.95.49.83]) by ifi.uio.no with ESMTP (8.6.11/ifi2.4) id for ; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 09:45:56 +0200 Original-Received: (from markus@localhost) by franck.pc.Uni-Koeln.DE (8.8.5/8.8.5) id JAA14993; Fri, 6 Jun 1997 09:46:04 +0200 Original-To: ding@ifi.uio.no X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.55/XEmacs 19.15 X-URL: http://www.uni-koeln.de/~acp66 X-PGP-Fingerprint: A0 FE 17 0C A6 B7 7A 0F F0 A0 04 45 F4 91 54 A7 X-Face: (EiYvvA${"nyp)>kY)*s@0|x+.`PH2*GP}HF}/U6e>vR>0R#V9IF'@a>ce?{Oud Au}2Om|K S6R{JT$|\ZF(IHHey5B(*+8.N_Z.c]O2KVJSxAT-y6RNmspR{:=^^0-fq,>z'a+4'JQyxPMWnZ5#h<( Rq{]7T;:kg^k0-P64revjBT+P)^^':u9>]f2UEFssRXw2a}A63'eq2mhgY].cTp8LvDz0Jf$:CLW=Dl |Y73lr Original-Lines: 39 Original-Xref: altair.xemacs.org dgnus-list:1674 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11284 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:11284 Recently I switched to procmail to filter some mails from high volume mailinglists out of my inbox (I don't like my mail notifier do blink every few seconds). Personal mails and mails from some low volume lists stay in /var/spool/mail/$USER. I set "nnmail-use-procmail" and both the personal mails and the procmail-filtered mails are incorporated to Gnus. That's exactly the way I like it. Today I started Gnus and to new nnml groups showed up. The reason was that the procmail rule produced a file "ding.spool" while the nnml group I used for this list via the nnml-split-method variable was "Ding". This behaviour shows that Gnus doesn't split the procmail filtered mails again. I understand the manual that the variable "nnmail-resplit-incoming" is responsible for that. Do I have to set this variable or is it OK to get the procmail rule and nnmail-split-method in sync? The manual says.. "This also means that you probably don't want to set `nnmail-split-methods' either, which has some, perhaps, unexpected side effects." This is not what I want, since the remaining mails in /var/spool/mail/$USER should be split further by Gnus. Do I really have to decide to use procmail _or_ nnmail-split-method or is it justified to get the best from both? Many thanks for any advice on this, Markus -- Markus Dickebohm E-Mail: m.dickebohm@uni-koeln.de Physical Chemistry WWW : http://www.uni-koeln.de/~acp66/