From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi@gnus.org>
Subject: Re: gnus-summary-goto-last-article vs gnus-summary-pop-article
Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 17:45:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m34q0t7ccr.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <quack.20040708T0000.j5smc30yrr@hkn.eecs.berkeley.edu>
Karl Chen <quarl@nospam.quarl.org> writes:
> It seems like gnus-summary-pop-article is much more useful than
> gnus-summary-goto-last-article; why not by default bind "l" to
> gnus-summary-pop-article?
`l' is more like `C-x C-x' in a way -- it toggles between the two last
articles. I actually think that's more useful than going backwards in
the list of read articles. Probably.
--
(domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.)
larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-04-16 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-08 7:00 Karl Chen
2006-04-16 15:45 ` Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m34q0t7ccr.fsf@quimbies.gnus.org \
--to=larsi@gnus.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).