From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/55395 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jesper Harder Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Cache passwords Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:55:40 +0100 Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu Message-ID: References: <87vfoa5she.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1072821570 32182 80.91.224.253 (30 Dec 2003 21:59:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 21:59:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: ding-owner+M3935@lists.math.uh.edu Tue Dec 30 22:59:28 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AbRtg-0001of-00 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:59:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbRtR-0000K7-00; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:59:13 -0600 Original-Received: from justine.libertine.org ([66.139.78.221] ident=postfix) by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1) id 1AbRtN-0000K2-00 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:59:09 -0600 Original-Received: from pfepa.post.tele.dk (pfepa.post.tele.dk [195.41.46.235]) by justine.libertine.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B54F3A0038 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 15:59:07 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from [195.249.82.169] (0xc3f952a9.esnxr1.ras.tele.dk [195.249.82.169]) by pfepa.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6225247FEF9 for ; Tue, 30 Dec 2003 22:59:05 +0100 (CET) Original-To: ding@gnus.org Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: (Simon Josefsson's message of "Sun, 21 Dec 2003 12:52:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1004 (Gnus v5.10.4) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) Precedence: bulk Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55395 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:55395 Simon Josefsson writes: > (defvar password-data (make-vector 7 0)) Is there a particular reason for using an obarray rather than a hash table?