From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/45287
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jesper Harder <harder@ifa.au.dk>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Compiled format specs in .newsrc.eld?
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:13:15 +0200
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m34rg2gcqc.fsf@defun.localdomain>
References: <m3n0txxtsr.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<vaffzzo1lz3.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<m3znxwklm2.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<vafn0tvr145.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<yotl3cvmksry.fsf@jpl.org>
	<vaf3cvmav6u.fsf@INBOX.auto.gnus.tok.lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<ilusn3mhuil.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
	<m37kky0zf2.fsf@defun.localdomain>
	<iluofeakn0k.fsf@latte.josefsson.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1024327031 7586 127.0.0.1 (17 Jun 2002 15:17:11 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 15:17:11 +0000 (UTC)
Return-path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 17JyFj-0001yF-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:17:11 +0200
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu ([129.7.128.10] ident=lists)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 17JyF5-000570-00; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:16:31 -0500
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:16:50 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (qmailr@sclp3.sclp.com [209.196.61.66])
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA05454
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:16:39 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 14995 invoked by alias); 17 Jun 2002 15:16:16 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 14990 invoked from network); 17 Jun 2002 15:16:15 -0000
Original-Received: from pfepc.post.tele.dk (193.162.153.4)
  by gnus.org with SMTP; 17 Jun 2002 15:16:15 -0000
Original-Received: from defun.localdomain (0xc3d7e0d2.esnxr4.ras.tele.dk [195.215.224.210])
	by pfepc.post.tele.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC37626325C
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Mon, 17 Jun 2002 17:16:13 +0200 (CEST)
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: <iluofeakn0k.fsf@latte.josefsson.org> (jas@extundo.com's
 message of "Mon, 17 Jun 2002 14:18:23 +0000 (UTC)")
Original-Lines: 13
User-Agent: Gnus/5.090007 (Oort Gnus v0.07) Emacs/21.2 (i686-pc-linux-gnu)
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45287
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:45287

jas@extundo.com (Simon Josefsson) writes:

> Does it improve alot to do M-x gnus-compile?

I don't think `gnus-compile' matters much.  The *really* important
formats specs (e.g. the one controlling summary buffer lines) are
byte-compiled automatically (unless you set `gnus-use-byte-compile' to
nil).

>  Anyone care to benchmark?

There's no difference for summary buffer generation.  Of course, that's
hardly surprising, since there *shouldn't* be any difference.