From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32961
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mail-{Followup,Reply}-To
Date: 24 Oct 2000 18:48:00 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m34s21ama1.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
References: <m37l6zcm7w.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<vafk8ay5zy1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<rj66miv25r.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169156 22683 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:59:16 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:59:16 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9BAED049A
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:52:17 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAB07615;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:48:51 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:48:15 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA27401
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 17:48:02 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.239.69])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 333ADD049A
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 18:48:24 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 1640 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2000 22:48:22 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "24 Oct 2000 14:45:04 +0200"
Original-Lines: 10
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32961
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32961

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
> I don't think it would be hard to teach message.el to obey the two
> headers.  It could also generate the two headers based on group
> parameters.  If "broken-reply-to" is set, generate "mail-reply-to".

Is broken-reply-to currently used for anything?  I wonder if this
should be handled separately.


paul