From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/32956
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: prj@po.cwru.edu (Paul Jarc)
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Mail-{Followup,Reply}-To
Date: 24 Oct 2000 09:52:56 -0400
Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m34s22fir5.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
References: <m37l6zcm7w.fsf@multivac.student.cwru.edu>
	<vafk8ay5zy1.fsf@lucy.cs.uni-dortmund.de>
	<rj66miv25r.fsf@ssv2.dina.kvl.dk>
NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035169152 22663 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 02:59:12 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 02:59:12 +0000 (UTC)
Return-Path: <owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from spinoza.math.uh.edu (spinoza.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.18])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 584E1D051F
	for <jason@mastaler.com>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:56:00 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5])
	by spinoza.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id IAB24330;
	Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:54:07 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:53:18 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from mailhost.sclp.com (postfix@66-209.196.61.interliant.com [209.196.61.66] (may be forged))
	by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA24266
	for <ding@hpc.uh.edu>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 08:53:06 -0500 (CDT)
Original-Received: from multivac.student.cwru.edu (multivac.STUDENT.CWRU.Edu [129.22.239.69])
	by mailhost.sclp.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 02888D051F
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Tue, 24 Oct 2000 09:53:18 -0400 (EDT)
Original-Received: (qmail 31697 invoked by uid 500); 24 Oct 2000 13:53:18 -0000
Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "24 Oct 2000 14:45:04 +0200"
Original-Lines: 32
User-Agent: Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) Emacs/20.7
Precedence: list
X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32956
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:32956

Per Abrahamsen <abraham@dina.kvl.dk> writes:
> Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE (Kai Gro=DFjohann) writes:
> > AFAICS, the code does not know about Mail-Followup-To.
>=20
> Should it?=20=20

Yes.  If I set Mail-Followup-To, it means I want people to obey it.
E.g., if you followup to this message, I don't want a separate copy.
(If you send one anyway, it'll bounce, with message directing to a web
page about Mail-Followup-To.)

> I don't think it would be hard to teach message.el to obey the two
> headers.

I'll try to give it a go.

> It could also generate the two headers based on group parameters.
> If "broken-reply-to" is set, generate "mail-reply-to".

Mail-Reply-To instead of Reply-To, you mean?

> If "to-list" or "to-address" is set, generate "mail-followup-to".
> The last should probably be controlled by a separate flag though.

Definitely a separate flag.  You don't necessarily need to set
Mail-Followup-To *from Gnus* at all.  I have:
(setq message-send-mail-function 'message-send-mail-with-qmail) so
mail messages are submitted to the qmail-inject program, which can
insert Mail-Followup-To fields when they aren't already present.


paul