From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/27203 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Volovich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: doubling addresses when following up Date: 24 Nov 1999 10:32:20 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035164271 23356 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:37:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:37:51 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA22277 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:39:51 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAB16902; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:39:11 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:39:17 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id KAA15037 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:38:56 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from relay2.vsu.ru (mail.vsu.ru [62.76.169.17]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA22265 for ; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 11:38:13 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: by relay2.vsu.ru (Postfix, from userid 5) id 80AEE19C4; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 19:36:30 +0300 (MSK) Original-Received: (from vvv@localhost) by vvv.vsu.ru (8.9.3/8.9.3) id KAA00964; Wed, 24 Nov 1999 10:32:20 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 12 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070098 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.98) Emacs/20.4 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27203 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:27203 Hi, suppose that some message has headers To: someone@domain.com Reply-To: SomeOne@domain.com When i followup to this message, gnus puts both addresses (one to To:, and one to Cc:). But these addresses differ only by case. Do RFCs say that email addresses are case-insensitive? If so, then gnus should ignore duplicated emails which differ only by case. Best regards, -- Vladimir.