From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/25443 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: reading active file / the wait Date: 27 Sep 1999 19:33:16 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035162827 13982 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 01:13:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 01:13:47 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from bart.math.uh.edu (bart.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.48]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04768 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:42:31 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by bart.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAB25333; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:42:30 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:42:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA21025 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 12:41:54 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from quimbies.gnus.org (sparky.gnus.org [193.69.4.146]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04676 for ; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 13:39:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by quimbies.gnus.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA00855; Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:43:39 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: His Name Is Alive's _Can't Always Be Loved_: "Wish I Had A Wishing Ring (uncut)" Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Harry Putnam's message of "25 Sep 1999 17:10:31 -0700" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070097 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.97) XEmacs/21.2 (Sumida) X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > I wondered if that speed was abnormal (modem connection 56k but > usually connects around 26-30) The speed is definitely abnormal, unless you use a 486 or something. > Would the "check-new-groups" setting be important? I see no > difference with "nil" or "t". You should: (setq gnus-check-new-newsgroups 'ask-server) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen