From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/20080 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Vladimir Volovich Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: 0.69 does not write filename=... in Content-Desposition Date: 04 Jan 1999 23:39:33 +0300 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035158418 15674 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 00:00:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:00:18 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from karazm.math.uh.edu (karazm.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA24848 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:50:28 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by karazm.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAB20010; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 14:50:12 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Mon, 04 Jan 1999 14:48:02 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [204.252.123.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAA13489 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 14:47:52 -0600 (CST) Original-Received: from cc.vsu.ru (root@ns.vsu.relarn.ru [194.226.24.1]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id PAA19842 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 15:47:35 -0500 (EST) Original-Received: (from uucp@localhost) by cc.vsu.ru (8.9.1/8.9.1) with UUCP id XAA22800 for ding@gnus.org; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 23:46:07 +0300 Original-Received: (from vvv@localhost) by vvv.vsu.ru (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA22196; Mon, 4 Jan 1999 23:39:33 +0300 Original-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 9 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070069 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.69) Emacs/20.3 Precedence: list X-Majordomo: 1.94.jlt7 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20080 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:20080 Hi, Happy New Year to all! subject says it all: with 0.69 there are no filename fields in Content-Desposition (it worked ok in prev. version, though dirnames were not stripped off from filenames :). Best regards, -- Vladimir.