From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/73679 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Outstanding stuff? Date: Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:40:46 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87mxq91zko.fsf@uwo.ca> <8739rryvn2.fsf@uwo.ca> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1288392343 27485 80.91.229.12 (29 Oct 2010 22:45:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2010 22:45:43 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M22048@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Oct 30 00:45:42 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxha-00080T-M0 for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:45:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxhE-0000Zb-6W; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:45:16 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxhC-0000ZJ-6P for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxh7-0001ka-9f for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:45:13 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1PBxh6-0005Q3-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PBxh2-0007pM-Cg for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:45:04 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:45:04 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 30 Oct 2010 00:45:04 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 33 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAHlBMVEWAnsZsjrv++d1zk77d 2MlIZIZpirMICwtjg6kgOFaREkMdAAACN0lEQVQ4jXXUT2/aMBQA8MeAqrvViopyRBmTeiTzQD0i lqrtbWz16tyWsVj5BlluRW0i79itNPjb7j2H/BnrLIWAf9jPL3k26P80qG5JdStUFwplW4G/IsaV agA7WYQf+IU5nPsjogLwZ8QYG41oFGOcc2MbFLafWlQBK1NqkMg4z2O5irUrZa5PtQ4rmOOEMt5s TjeukDp3Z+4elHajhHEMN0oKde5u3P1UvG4+huFTAEhfAuyH47KC6R5YDYufFczMI17PfgNAkNWw a2EQduHZJ6HYMBRlPVUfwcawIESZEfjM6eO/uxD+SA0uN2ibjZ2L2ywbIiy9pi0ItLg16WvM4xBw BIbA4OLGO8OrhmkuTJqWCNsn7615auBEC1NS8Jk5hBBXu4X1LPwbnCQ0GWU+Hyy9CbxqYH0chpg6 rA+XewLUn/2bxzqnR7WD9WEejhAmNF8wePHdG/N3bR4AfXxvCAfLBQJ4GTiBqmE8CCCWd0cFlsP8 HuH8/r33Rn3zrqlitze59M6M/oxQL/cytRA8jIXQv7tQ4iqNxCIxuyGBs4fr1Aidi6ssF+LikYFK 8DlNgqV3IeQdBLCQEG7FygEV21X9ssG34uNEBFqEOKKoAXPoa/0VM9eFXqkWqEp6VEMObryIQD7g O//kLYIBgkN7LtEbBBW0j7fHeZ/7iErhru3Ah2o/4Ja3EHRHEFQHAEIzhsDBeRJ7MtiqRcKa6DlY 3qo+MjpF3WMjppIaBi0c0blRHTJ/AB9bQ8a9tEtAAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Simple Minds's _Sister Feelings Call_: "Sound in 70 Cities" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:3MrlmCJtK2erZAmb+jG802/7UK4= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:73679 Archived-At: Dan Christensen writes: > So it seems like some internal data structure gets mangled. Yup. > This all happens even with threading turned off... Huh. I thought it kinda worked with threading off... > I'm curious why this is much different from when a new article arrives > and we hit `/ N' to include it in the summary buffer. Mainly because the Message-ID remains the same, while `/ N' doesn't have that problem. I think. Or I may just be thinking about this the wrong way. It's entirely possible. > (gnus-summary-insert-new-articles) Hm... perhaps I could give gnus-summary-insert-articles a try. [tests] Nope, didn't seem to work... > Being able to strip attachments is crucial to me, so if there's anything > I can do to help debug this, let me know. Well, if you can find out why it doesn't work, that'd be great. :-) -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen