From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/70737 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: That newfangled IMAP thing... Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:06 +0200 Organization: Programmerer Ingebrigtsen Message-ID: References: <87hbi3jasy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87pqwmsusz.fsf@news.realpath.org> <8762yd6j4j.fsf@rimspace.net> <87eid0fsil.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp84y00w.fsf@keller.adm.naquadah.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284226302 31924 80.91.229.12 (11 Sep 2010 17:31:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2010 17:31:42 +0000 (UTC) To: ding@gnus.org Original-X-From: ding-owner+M19109@lists.math.uh.edu Sat Sep 11 19:31:39 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ding-account@gmane.org Original-Received: from util0.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.18]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTvI-0007ZY-4C for ding-account@gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu) by util0.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTvB-0001I4-KD; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:31:25 -0500 Original-Received: from mx1.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.32]) by util0.math.uh.edu with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTv9-0001Hp-S0 for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:31:23 -0500 Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.231.51]) by mx1.math.uh.edu with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTv5-00080f-7E for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 12:31:23 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian)) id 1OuTv4-0004OY-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:18 +0200 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OuTv0-0007Sh-UE for ding@gnus.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no ([84.215.34.171]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:14 +0200 Original-Received: from larsi by cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2010 19:31:14 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: ding@gnus.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: cm-84.215.34.171.getinternet.no Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEWVc57bzeK2nsQ/ChRp Kjapj7oug7f/AAACUklEQVQ4jVWUwY7kIAxE3RlyD0i5B2t8bwk+gO3Qd+Id/v9XtgydlYZDi+ZR lMshIWq0EoZLYzwx7V27YH2Cr5QNZExXADXBBzzPOkEXUQOdJqgln/8BU2v3UQtXOs1jlc4MpwnO 9AhHGKALG1h776ggpWWXLX0AjuqLtKlYuB+pYKo8FNjfBng1hJlAoVgNtFFuww/NgDxA7zPg2s6p MEKDfADdQAWga5u9ytrSANiPlnTRoUAT9Xu2RK0sO9ASOkr5hV6dxcxnwNUUbrVTUnYw5c6iloM7 6UFZHstXJpZVNKAqBlh79EeRZXH14QNcrSViEo5+W7UzuegD4yj2qE2aQNEej817d/m9S7eWmBAg HKVsRIWhiEFUrJWYxL3X989SS4v7YJF64wjFViuyuFrNwwcDanX5jSrWXXEGVKMnVgg4blj9PhDP B+kXqqRgoC2bs04i/IVt2q9AAu++6jfN4RZZ0QpUdXQN0vS71lJKrfUhPVzRC+2oOcrizjrG+bC7 w1FJNg2+6Q3qSyLK4kgSOPiD6w3eEhGAA7Fn72U/b1DQIu5BKA6wAUxUkI41RIAQA2/1BlU9MhqA ReADy6lmA0gdFI826o4tEySsPwF2lstANFCx30AxEE1xAXCrZwY4JwiRL/IcACinG8gFT43ko4cH 3psBciqCYqKBYMClE7cwG2j4b7fEBAD5b05vGKUX+zEm2F2ln/P5AvgzNt6KnZynTI+fSjI88Win EFf1Xcm+BUv8HOWnx/iOZDTs+gU8XrIB0tP7X8AfdX6WXjf4B5tqsFjiy12WAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Playing: Boris's _Japanese Heavy Rock Hits v3_: "... and hear nothing" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:/09+cH4xA+f/1gMuH1ur1BPi/1U= X-Spam-Score: -1.9 (-) List-ID: Precedence: bulk Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:70737 Archived-At: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eurhm. I'm reading the RFC, and I'm wondering whether I'm seriously > missing something. > > Is the client supposed to do a > > EXAMINE foo > FETCH 1:* (FLAGS) I mean, the client has to do that once, at least, but is there anything in the protocol that the client can use to not do a complete rescan the next time? The UIDNEXT response to the EXAMINE call will increase if a new article has been added, which helps, since the client can ignore scanning groups where that hasn't changed, but I scanning the RFC, I can't find anything to help with the question "has any flags changed"? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen