From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/35340 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nevin Kapur Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Problems with getting new mail at any particular level. Date: 14 Mar 2001 09:47:04 -0500 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035171101 2511 80.91.224.250 (21 Oct 2002 03:31:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 03:31:41 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: (qmail 29022 invoked by alias); 14 Mar 2001 14:47:21 -0000 Original-Received: (qmail 29017 invoked from network); 14 Mar 2001 14:47:20 -0000 Original-Received: from fermat.mts.jhu.edu (root@128.220.17.18) by gnus.org with SMTP; 14 Mar 2001 14:47:20 -0000 Original-Received: (from kapur@localhost) by fermat.mts.jhu.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id f2EElJr30908; Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:47:19 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: fermat.mts.jhu.edu: kapur set sender to nevin@jhu.edu using -f Original-To: ding@gnus.org X-Face: 5qz+Fg"Lb1Z3i<6h&9Ax$jfq]k{-f:z_Uk_fQ_DOy|7;xWm4@bDK52s/-A\!8g'3a}peKv> u;mMlqf!3"K"X5B;2E|Nz}< (Kai.Grossjohann@CS.Uni-Dortmund.DE's message of "Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:12:14 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090001 (Oort Gnus v0.01) XEmacs/21.1 (Channel Islands) Original-Lines: 26 Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35340 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:35340 On Wed, 14 Mar 2001, Kai Großjohann wrote: > On 14 Mar 2001, Nevin Kapur wrote: > >> Fortunately, I found I workaround. My usual setup is to use >> procmail to split my incoming mail into just two folders FM and >> NFM, and then use Gnus' fancy spitting by setting >> nnmail-resplit-incoming to t, for finer control. I use > > I see. I think if you hit `1 g' and the only level-1 group is > nnml:foo, then Gnus will only look at ~/.spool/foo. I think this is correct. I stepped through debugging mail-sources-fetch and this was the behavior I observed. > I take it that there are no groups nnml:FM and nnml:NFM? Exactly. I am interested in hearing from folks who use procmail and the directory entry in mail-sources. Does '1 g' work for them? Does anybody else use procmail *and* nnmail-resplit-incoming? Does '1 g' work in that case? -- Nevin