From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17896 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Some MIME suggestions... Date: 18 Oct 1998 18:23:39 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156513 3232 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:28:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:28:33 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from fisher.math.uh.edu (fisher.math.uh.edu [129.7.128.35]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA28080 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:36:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (lists@Sina.HPC.UH.EDU [129.7.3.5]) by fisher.math.uh.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAB11933; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 11:31:12 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Sun, 18 Oct 1998 11:31:07 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id LAA25065 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 11:30:57 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp031.uio.no [129.240.240.32]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id MAA27935 for ; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 12:30:42 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id SAA07796; Sun, 18 Oct 1998 18:30:37 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Jane Smiley's _At Paradise Gate_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Hrvoje Niksic's message of "18 Oct 1998 14:56:31 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070035 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.35) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Please do regard it as copying. Yup. Fix in Pterodactyl Gnus v0.35. > > Er... Yes, one really should. But that kinda makes all the > > highlighting and everything away, which makes things a bit awkward. > > Why would that make it awkward? Aren't highlights *supposed* to go > away when you're editing the article? I don't really see why. Some people edit articles quite a lot (to correct little things), and having the article look as similar as possible when editing and viewing seems like a good idea. It's also an efficiency thing -- re-highlighting everything after every little edit would be annoying, especially in large articles. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen