From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/17337 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: Utter frustration Date: 23 Sep 1998 22:14:29 +0200 Sender: owner-ding@hpc.uh.edu Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: coloc-standby.netfonds.no X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1035156055 392 80.91.224.250 (20 Oct 2002 23:20:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 23:20:55 +0000 (UTC) Return-Path: Original-Received: from gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (gizmo.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.102.31]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA21217 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:18:32 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from sina.hpc.uh.edu (sina.hpc.uh.edu [129.7.3.5]) by gizmo.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.6/8.7.3) with ESMTP id OAF02347; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 14:49:28 -0500 Original-Received: by sina.hpc.uh.edu (TLB v0.09a (1.20 tibbs 1996/10/09 22:03:07)); Wed, 23 Sep 1998 15:16:46 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com (root@sclp3.sclp.com [209.195.19.139]) by sina.hpc.uh.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id PAA22956 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 15:15:55 -0500 (CDT) Original-Received: from sparky.gnus.org (ppp031.uio.no [129.240.240.32]) by sclp3.sclp.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA21100 for ; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 16:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: (from larsi@localhost) by sparky.gnus.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id WAA01063; Wed, 23 Sep 1998 22:16:50 +0200 Mail-Copies-To: never X-Now-Reading: Stephen Jay Goulds _Hønsetenner og hestetær_ Original-To: ding@gnus.org In-Reply-To: Per Abrahamsen's message of "21 Sep 1998 19:31:05 +0200" User-Agent: Gnus/5.070032 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.32) Emacs/20.3 X-Face: &w!^oO~dS|}-P0~ge{$c!h\ writes: > Gnus could be more helpful. Something like: > > (when (< last-article-number-on-server last-read-article-number) The problem here is that `last-article-number-on-server' is something that may not be all that reliable. For instance, I sometimes switch between having `gnus-read-active-file' set to t, `some' and nil. On the nntp server I use, all these three return differing data. (Vaguely differing.) So this test would routinely trigger for me. Being asked to nuke all the data in this situation would not be helpful, since many people always answer "yes" to questions they do not ask. And that would be disasterous in this situation. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) larsi@gnus.org * Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen