From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Msuck: nntp://news.gmane.io/gmane.emacs.gnus.general/53808
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Jesper Harder <harder@myrealbox.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.gnus.general
Subject: Re: Ist multipart/mixed really correct?
Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:32:09 +0200
Organization: http://purl.org/harder/
Sender: ding-owner@lists.math.uh.edu
Message-ID: <m37k52ua12.fsf@defun.localdomain>
References: <m3vfsnx75t.fsf@hamster.pflaesterer.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1061753758 30353 80.91.224.253 (24 Aug 2003 19:35:58 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Aug 2003 19:35:58 +0000 (UTC)
Original-X-From: ding-owner+M2348@lists.math.uh.edu Sun Aug 24 21:35:57 2003
Return-path: <ding-owner+M2348@lists.math.uh.edu>
Original-Received: from malifon.math.uh.edu ([129.7.128.13])
	by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
	id 19r0ea-00027C-00
	for <ding-account@gmane.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:35:56 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.math.uh.edu)
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19r0dg-0003Td-00; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:35:00 -0500
Original-Received: from sclp3.sclp.com ([64.157.176.121])
	by malifon.math.uh.edu with smtp (Exim 3.20 #1)
	id 19r0dY-0003TV-00
	for ding@lists.math.uh.edu; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 14:34:52 -0500
Original-Received: (qmail 88613 invoked by alias); 24 Aug 2003 19:34:51 -0000
Original-Received: (qmail 88608 invoked from network); 24 Aug 2003 19:34:51 -0000
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org (80.91.224.244)
  by sclp3.sclp.com with SMTP; 24 Aug 2003 19:34:51 -0000
Original-Received: from news by quimby.gnus.org with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 19r0ij-0004Cw-00
	for <ding@gnus.org>; Sun, 24 Aug 2003 21:40:13 +0200
Original-To: ding@gnus.org
Original-Path: localhost.localdomain!nobody
Original-Newsgroups: gnus.ding
Original-Lines: 11
Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 0xc3f95342.esnxr2.ras.tele.dk
Original-X-Trace: quimby.gnus.org 1061754013 16177 195.249.83.66 (24 Aug 2003 19:40:13 GMT)
Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@quimby.gnus.org
Original-NNTP-Posting-Date: 24 Aug 2003 19:40:13 GMT
X-Face: ^RrvqCr7c,P$zTR:QED"@h9+BTm-"fjZJJ-3=OU7.)i/K]<.J88}s>'Z_$r;<N5ksn~%wJ@2pjF}="tV;FBsdpFarSWA<oYkZsViGf:F^SD-KXhvFxh;~]?)SWm~+u};0=x}<vOm&5J+?]yB2d]q4x8\0g7SX
Mail-Copies-To: never
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pa/qPW18xpdzmq5POdzMMDlo+js=
Precedence: bulk
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53808
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.gnus.general:53808

sigurd@12move.de (Karl Pflästerer) writes:

> from a discussion in another newsgroup about the fact that Gnus under
> special circumstances does create multipart postings we thought about
> the correct value for the mime header.
>
> Gnus declares the posting as multipart/mixed but according to rfc 2046
> multipart/parallel seems to be the correct alternative. WDYT?

Hard to say without knowing which special circumstances you're
thinking about.